Dynamic History
Hammurabi’s Code: Was Babylonian Justice Fair? | Dynamic History Module | Grades 6-8
Hammurabi’s Code: Was Babylonian Justice Fair? | Dynamic History Module | Grades 6-8
Couldn't load pickup availability
Classroom Use at a Glance
A complete grades 6-8 Dynamic History lesson on Hammurabi and Babylonian justice, calibrated primarily to Grade 6. Includes a six-stop two-day interactive investigation, Teacher Guide and Answer Key, and shared Google classroom files. Students compare earlier law collections, Hammurabi’s stele, status-based penalties, the river ordeal, court records, scribal evidence, and the stele’s later movement while distinguishing claims, records, and inference.
Classroom Uses Whole Class, Small Groups, Content-Area Reading, Discussion, Assessment, Review, Homework, Sub Plan view all
- Whole Class
- Small Groups
- Content-Area Reading
- Discussion
- Assessment
- Review
- Homework
- Sub Plan
Included Teacher Guide, Student Worksheet, Answer Key, Quiz, Google Forms Quiz, Vocabulary, Challenge Questions view all
- Teacher Guide
- Student Worksheet
- Answer Key
- Quiz
- Google Forms Quiz
- Vocabulary
- Challenge Questions
Format PDF, DOCX, Google Docs, Google Slides, Google Forms, ZIP Download, Printable, Editable view all
- DOCX
- Google Docs
- Google Slides
- Google Forms
- ZIP Download
- Printable
- Editable
Differentiation Accessible Version, Mixed Reading Levels, ELL Support, Struggling Readers, Vocabulary Support, Small-Group Support view all
- Accessible Version
- Mixed Reading Levels
- ELL Support
- Struggling Readers
- Vocabulary Support
- Small-Group Support
Help students investigate whether Babylonian justice was fair through a six-stop evidence study of Hammurabi and Mesopotamian law. This Dynamic History module for grades 6-8, calibrated primarily to Grade 6, compares earlier law collections, Hammurabi’s stele, rank-based penalties, the river ordeal, surviving court records, and the monument’s later journey.
Students work with maps, legal texts, royal imagery, court evidence, scribal copies, and provenance. The investigation asks students to distinguish Hammurabi’s claims from what the rulings show, compare how social rank affected outcomes, and separate direct records from supported historical inference.
Will this meet my classroom's needs?
Try the first lesson for FREE and see how the Dynamic History format works with your students before purchasing.
Want to save 35%?
Get the full seven-lesson bundle here and save 35% compared with purchasing the six paid lessons individually.
What students investigate
- Why Hammurabi’s law collection was part of an older Mesopotamian written-law tradition rather than the first written set of laws
- How the Hammurabi-and-Shamash relief and the epilogue communicate royal claims about justice and authority
- How injury penalties, medical fees, and other rulings changed according to social rank and circumstances
- How Ruling 2 and Mari letters distinguish a written river-ordeal procedure from evidence of actual practice
- Why surviving court records and a Nippur law copy leave courtroom use unsettled rather than proving either use or nonuse
- How evidence for the stele’s movement from Mesopotamia to Susa requires historians to distinguish direct record from inference
What's included
- Two-day guided Dynamic History investigation with six historical stops
- Teacher Guide and Answer Key with suggested Day 1 and Day 2 pacing
- Editable digital student worksheet and print student worksheet
- Self-graded Google Forms quiz and multiple-choice print quiz
- Assessment bank with 5 vocabulary terms, 4 two-part short-answer questions, 2 two-part challenge questions, and 15 multiple-choice questions
Flexible classroom use
- Teach the core investigation across two 45-50 minute class periods
- Use the interactive Dynamic History experience when students have devices
- Use selected written questions for homework, review, or a short check for understanding
- Use the complete assessment as a separate assessment period when desired
Skills addressed
- Using maps, artifacts, legal texts, and court evidence to support historical claims
- Distinguishing royal claims and written rulings from evidence of actual legal practice
- Comparing how social rank changed penalties, fees, and legal outcomes
- Distinguishing direct records from supported historical inference
- Building a qualified fairness judgment that identifies both evidence and uncertainty
Standards alignment
CCSS History/Social Studies literacy connections documented in the Teacher Guide include RH.6-8.1, RH.6-8.2, RH.6-8.6, and RH.6-8.7. Written synthesis may support WHST.6-8.9.
Share
